It is a Biden executive order couched in the usual progressive jargon about ‘diversity’ and ‘equity.’ Yet buried within its social justice verbiage is a disturbing clause that could ensure that Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms are all as ‘Woke’ as the now-infamously biased AI bot Chat GPT.
It is called the “Executive Order on Further Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through The Federal Government.” It appears that what the presidential action will really advance is more government control and policing over free speech.
In the executive order‘s section under “Embedding Equity into Government-wide Processes,” the Director of the Office of Management and Budget is instructed “to support equitable decision-making, promote equitable deployment of financial and technical assistance, and assist agencies in advancing equity, as appropriate and wherever possible.” The phrase that follows is a trojan horse for the radical left’s agenda:
When designing, developing, acquiring, and using artificial intelligence and automated systems in the Federal Government, agencies shall do so, consistent with applicable law, in a manner that advances equity.
The implementation of the executive order would entail a “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion” (DEI) board that would supervise the rollout of AI bots across the country in order to recruit them into the Woke army.
The most blatant example of political bias in a chatbot has to be Open AI’s Chat GPT. It was once a non-profit project that included the likes of current Twitter CEO and tech billionaire Elon Musk, before he abandoned the project and Chat GPT became a for-profit enterprise.
In a lengthy and informative thread that Elon Musk responded to, the investigative journalist Kanekoa breaks down Chat GPT’s absurdly biased algorithm.
#1 David Sacks breaks down how the safety layer of 'ChatGPT is a Democrat':
"There is mounting evidence OpenAI's safety layer is very biased… If you thought trust and safety were bad under Vijaya or Yoel, wait until the AI does it."https://t.co/X63j1DmJdu@DavidSacks @amuse pic.twitter.com/yyzLb19NLy
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) February 20, 2023
“OpenAI got started because [Elon Musk] warned that AI was going to take over the world… and he donated a huge amount of money to set up a non-profit to promote AI ethics,” Sacks said on the All-In Podcast.
“This is the power to rewrite history; it’s the power to rewrite society, to reprogram what people learn and what they think,” he added.
“Very important thread,” Musk said.
Very important thread
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 20, 2023
Kanekoa provided several examples of Chat GPT’s absurd bias: ChatGPT won’t praise Donald Trump but will praise Joe Biden. ChatGPT won’t clearly define a woman. ChatGPT would rather millions die than use a racial slur. ChatGPT refuses to praise @benshapiro because it avoids “political bias,” but it will write a glowing report about @brianstelter. ChatGPT will only write about the flaws of white people. ChatGPT says all Republicans have had a negative impact, while all Democrats have had a positive impact.
How woke is ChatGPT?
I asked it to assign scores to the list below, for whether their impact is positive or negative.
Result: All conservatives get negative scores, and all liberals get positive scores (Fauci and Bill Gates highest scores). Not a single exception.#WokeGPT 🤡 pic.twitter.com/RDTdRgGLQM
— Dr. Eli David (@DrEliDavid) February 20, 2023
There is debate over whether or not the AI chatbot is merely a reflection of ‘Woke’ culture or it is coded to be politically biased. These examples show a bias that go beyond a mere reflection of the culture. The chatbot refuses to answer certain questions and gives pre-programmed answers, which reveals that it is coded to be ‘Woke.’
If the Biden administration gets its way, this is how all AI bots will be in the future: An army of left-wing thought police armed to shut down freedom of thought with censorship and propaganda.
NOW READ:
Trump to Visit East Palestine and Make a Big Act of Generosity
"*" indicates required fields
OPINION: This article contains commentary which reflects the author's opinion.