A new lawsuit launched in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts is one of the first in the United States that argues that ‘fraud’ was perpetrated on the American people during the Covid pandemic.
The lawsuit is brought by John Paul Beaudoin against Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker, the public health examiner, the chief medical examiner, and additional medical examiners. It brings forth evidence that over 50 cases of deaths the state coded as Covid-19 deaths were in many cases strongly linked to recent Covid-19 vaccination.
“This Complaint is a request for injunctive relief where the source of fraudulent misrepresentation, purposely conducted, continues to harm both Plaintiff and the public,” the plaintiff argues. “As a matter of equity, third party liability should be considered. In fairness and equity, the harm must cease forthwith; and the Court has the discretion to do so pre, pending, and post-investigation of the fraud claims herein.”
“Relying on false information obtained through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), sourced, in part, from Massachusetts Department of Public Health (“MA DPH”), Massachusetts School of Law (“MSLaw’) instituted a COVID-19 vaccination mandate for all students and staff,” the lawsuit continues. “Plaintiff, a rising second-year law student, refused the vaccination because he has four pre-existing health
issues consistent with thousands of COVID-19 vaccine injuries reported to VAERS even as of April 2021. Moreover, the Plaintiff’s sincerely held religious beliefs prompted him to apply for a religious exemption offered by MSLaw. MSLaw never apprised the Plaintiff of the status of his application for a religious exemption. Rather, the only ‘statu’ that the School acted on was the Plaintiff’s student status, which the School unilaterally, capriciously, and arbitrarily changed to ‘unenrolled’.’
It is at this point that a sidebar must be allowed in order to point out, once again, that the Covid “vaccines” do not prevent transmission of the virus; therefore, vaccination is solely and indisputably a matter of personal health risk, and furthermore, is a matter that should solely be at a patient’s discretion with the consultation of his or her doctor.
“Although Plaintiff is pursuing a remedy at law against MSLaw for pecuniary damages, there is no remedy at law that can undo MSLaw’s injurious acts against Plaintiff especially in consideration of its reliance on CDC and FDA misinformation; nor is there a remedy at law, sans the relief sought in this Complaint, that will prevent another law school from exacting the same or similar vaccination requirements on Plaintiff,” the lawsuit adds. “Most, if not all, law schools require COVID-19
vaccination and do so based on the fraudulent misinformation issued by the CDC and FDA and sourced, in part, from MA DPH. Plaintiff is injured in being deprived of a legal education offered to all those who assume the risk of COVID-19 vaccination.”
“This coercion, again, is based on fraudulent misinformation originated at MA DPH and disseminated by the CDC and FDA to law schools et al,” the lawsuit further states. ” The fraudulent misinformation manifests from numerous Death Certificate records that wrongly list ‘COVID-19’ as a cause of death when, more accurately, the deceased tested positive for strands of proteins which may have been SARS-COV-2 virus at one time.”
“Specifically, numerous deaths caused by fentanyl overdose, heart attacks, cancer, and many others causes are labeled a ‘COVID-19’ death when, in fact, COVID-19 had no causal relationship to the death,” the lawsuit goes on. “All these fraudulent misrepresentations aggregate to support a false narrative that has injured Plaintiff and continues to injure society by depriving generations of people of accurate information to make an informed consent and convincing institutions to coerce people under color of law to take an experimental biological product not fully tested in humans, and one that can possibly kill them and has killed many.”
The Plaintiff provides in Exhibit F a sample of death certificate records along with the vaccination-to-onset time of death and the attributed causes, which have been linked in certain cases to various Covid-19 vaccines.
The lawsuit provides in Exhibit G circumstantial evidence that corroborates the likely data fraud by showing excess mortality rates in the United States did not significantly decline despite the widespread availability of Covid vaccines in 2021.
The attached charts show that while the all-cause and purported Covid deaths were reported to have gone down, the I-code (circulatory system deahts) and cardiac arrhythmia deaths were reported to have gone up.
It should again be pointed out in a sidebar here that Covid-19 itself cannot be made entirely attributable for the rise in cardiac-related deaths in 2021. Furthermore, a large population study at the Journal of Clinical Medicine published in June showed the risk of myocarditis remained elevated after the booster dose and that longer intervals between each consecutive dose (including booster doses) may decrease the occurrence of vaccine-associated myocarditis.”
The plaintiff’s argument is blunt: The state has committed Covid-19 data fraud, and many hospitals and clinicians had a financial interest in committing it.
“Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and continuing through 2022, numerous fentanyl overdose deaths, blunt force trauma deaths, and other causes of death unrelated to COVID-19 fraudulently included U071 = “COVID-19” as a cause of death on the Death Certificate,” the lawsuit argues.
“The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), signed into law March 27, 2020, provides a complex scheme of funding to states, hospitals, and other entities for COVID-19-related patients. Plaintiff knows and understands through 30+ years in business settings and through Plaintiff’s MBA degree that the pay plan defines the behavior. The US Government set up the pay plan to incentivize labeling deaths with U071 = ‘COVID-19.’ As an independent journalist, Plaintiff discovered that agents of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts solicited medical examiners to include U071 = ‘COVID-19’ on Death Certificates. This ‘pattern’ of conduct having ‘taken control’ across the ‘enterprise’ of public health government and non-government organizations is contrary to the public health mission and was lethal to many herein detailed.”
“The CDC is now known to have directed the social media undermining of VAERS, while the CDC also eschewed analysis of VAERS data though they had primary responsibility for such work,” the lawsuit adds.
The lawsuit then argues that the state health agencies violated U.S. code by committing the alleged data fraud.
“The Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the preceding paragraphs of this Complaint and incorporates same herein. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1035”:
“(a) Whoever, in any matter involving a health care benefit program, knowingly and willfully, (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; or (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any materially false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items, or services, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
(b) As used in this section, the term “health care benefit program” has the meaning given such term in section 24(b) of this title.” As alleged herein, the Defendants purposely falsified, concealed, or covered up material facts in writings known as Death Certificates, then certified and entered these false writings into official state and federal vital records, excerpts of which are detailed in EXHIBIT F.”
This is one of the first lawsuits in the United States to directly accused state agencies of having committed fraud during the Covid pandemic. It will likely launch further inquiries into the manner that public health agencies reported Covid data during the pandemic in the public interest of holding any offending health officials accountable for knowingly and willfully misleading the American public.
If you believe that you have a claim against public health authorities, there are attorneys willing to help whistleblowers file their lawsuits against the state.
"*" indicates required fields
OPINION: This article contains commentary which reflects the author's opinion.