Skip to content

Dr. Fauci is Coming After Your Babies and Toddlers Next with Covid Vaccine Needle in Hand

Dr. Anthony Fauci has said and done a lot of reprehensible things since 1984, when he became the chief spreader of viral misinformation at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Despite Fauci lying to Congress about funding dangerous gain-of-function research at a Wuhan laboratory tied to the origins of Covid-19, the dishonest doctor has gone in front of cameras repeatedly to prime Americans for more draconian and unnecessary Covid mandates.

The latest example of the government’s relentless and senseless universal vaccination program is Dr. Fauci’s chilling remarks in an interview with the Insider.

“Hopefully within a reasonably short period of time, likely the beginning of next year in 2022, in the first quarter of 2022, it will be available to them,” Fauci  said. “Can’t guarantee it, you’ve got to do the clinical trial.”

So, let’s be clear: Dr. Fauci doesn’t even know the results of any clinical trials for this age demographic, but he believes it should “hopefully” be available for children in the beginning of 2022.

Just for context, here is the mortality risk from Covid-19 to this age demographic, according to the Centers for Disease Control.

As you can see, there were a total of 214 deaths for both sexes in this CDC report, and a total of 605 deaths up to age 18. There are approximately 20 million children in the 0-4 age cohort. Before calculating Covid mortality risk, one must account for the CDC’s reportage that 94% of mortalities have serious underlying health conditions.

The CDC stated: “For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.9 additional conditions or causes per death. The number of deaths with each condition or cause is shown for all deaths and by age groups.” This is why the CDC reports “Covid-related deaths” and not “Covid-caused deaths.”

If you factor in all Covid-related mortalities, the Covid survival rate is 99.99993%. If you rule out cases with serious underlying health conditions, leaving “healthy” children age 0-4, the Covid survival rate is 99.999995%. The risk/benefit analysis of injecting 20 million children with an mRNA prophylactic therapeutic when the healthy child’s survival rate is literally 99.999995% makes zero sense whatsoever. This is particularly true when acknowledging reported Adverse Events.

The FDA was recently legally compelled to release a batch of documents pertaining to its Emergency Use Authorization of the Pfizer-BioNTech “vaccine.” The first 91 pages of more than 329,000 pages that the FDA plans to release over the next 55 years are revealing. In particular, there is a section on pregnant mothers in the Adverse Events reportage section:

There were 274 relevant pregnancy cases with the following outcomes:

  • 270 mother cases and 4 foetus/baby cases representing 270 unique pregnancies (the 4 foetus/baby cases were linked to 3 mother cases; 1 mother case involved twins).
  • Pregnancy outcomes for the 270 pregnancies were reported as spontaneous abortion (23), outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1 each). No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were reported for each twin, and both were counted).

The reporting on the pediatric cases under the age of 12 states: “No new significant safety information was identified based on a review of these cases compared with the non-paediatric population.”

Further underscoring that vaccinating millions of people may be riskier long-term than the virus itself to certain sub-populations, the CDC reports that at least 146 million Americans have had prior Covid infections and survived. According to the CDC’s own statistics, this figure may be as high as 187.6 million Americans. Thus, tens of millions of Americans have “natural immunity,” which has been shown in multiple clinical studies to be superior to ‘vaccinated immunity.’

Despite the dearth of data and the lack of demonstrable need, Big Pharma is aiming to target toddlers and babies with Covid vaccines as early as first quarter 2022.

“The Food and Drug Administration and CDC won’t approve the vaccine until there’s some data showing safety and efficacy,” Philip Landrigan, a pediatrician and immunologist at Boston College, told CNN Health in early November.

“There’s every reason to think that it will be safe, and it will be efficacious,” Landrigan added. “But the agencies need to be cautious, justifiably so, and so they’re not going to give the approval until they have the data.”

So, even though the FDA is willing to risk future long-term harm to children by allowing pharmaceutical companies to inject as many as 20 million kids to potentially save 20 healthy kids, there are “experts” who are already predisposed to believe that it will likely be approved.

According to CNN, Pfizer is the furthest along in trials for children age 6 months to 5 years, although Moderna is also conducting studies on very young children.

“We don’t have enough data now to present it for a regulatory approach, but right now, the data are being collected and analyzed,” Fauci told CNN earlier this month. “So we will be able to answer the question, I believe, within a reasonable period of time regarding the safety and the immunogenicity among those lower than 5 years old.”

It would be remiss not to point out the numerous things that Dr. Anthony Fauci has been wrong about regarding Covid-19. Here is a sample:

  • In January Dr. Anthony Fauci told Newsmax TV that the United States “did not have to worry”about the coronavirus and that it was“not a major threat.”
  • Dr. Fauci warned of an apocalyptic coronavirus pandemic — then just weeks later he compared the coronavirus to a bad flu.
  • Dr. Fauci based all of his predictions on models that were off by millions and then later told reporters,“You can’t really rely on models.”

If being wrong wasn’t bad enough, Fauci has not only flip-flopped on masking, he is also a complete fraud on the matter. Politico Playbook this week revealed that his mask antics are just for public show:

Mask on, mask off. That as the name of the game for ANTHONY FAUCI at JONATHAN KARL’s book party Tuesday night at Café Milano. As gawkers tried to snap pictures of him indoors not wearing a mask, America’s doc would put it on and take it off depending on whom he was around. SALLY QUINN — who’s known Fauci since his days as a young NIH doctor, when he inspired a love interest in one of her erotic novels — asked him why he was at a party with a mask in hand, not on face. “I said, ‘You seem pretty ambivalent about your mask’ because no one else was wearing one,” Quinn told Playbook. “He said, ‘I just decided that if anyone came up that I didn’t know, I would put my mask on.’”

But it’s also vital to highlight just how wrong Fauci was back in the 1980s, when AIDS was the pandemic foremost in the public mind. Fauci whipped up hysteria about HIV transmission by suggesting that it might be casually transmitted to children.

“The finding of AIDS in infants and children who are household contacts of patients with AIDS or persons with risks for AIDS has enormous implications with regard to ultimate transmissibility of this syndrome,” Fauci said. “If routine close contact can spread the disease, AIDS takes on an entirely new dimension,” he added.

“Given the fact that incubation period for adults is believed to be longer than one year, the full impact of the syndrome among sexual contacts and recipients of potentially infective transfusions is uncertain at present. If we add to this the possibility that nonsexual, non-blood-borne transmission is possible, the scope of the syndrome may be enormous.”

Fauci nemesis Rand Paul has engaged in heated debates on “natural immunity,” and also on the matter of vaccines for children. Dr. Paul pointed out a New York Times report that showed children had coronavirus antibodies without even having Covid.

“It’s been a big puzzle of the pandemic: Why are children so much less likely than adults to become infected with the new coronavirus and, if infected, less likely to become ill?” the Times reported.

“A possible reason may be that many children already have antibodies to other coronaviruses, according to researchers at the Francis Crick Institute in London,” the story continued. “About one in five of the colds that plague children are caused by viruses in this family. Antibodies to those viruses may also block SARS-CoV-2, the new coronavirus causing the pandemic.”

“In a study published Friday in Science, the group, led by George Kassiotis, who heads the Retroviral Immunology Laboratory at the institute, reports that on average only 5 percent of adults had these antibodies, but 43 percent of children did,” the report continued.

The CDC recently admitted that over 146 million Americans have had prior infection to Covid, but survived it just fine. This number could be as high as 187.6 million people, according to CDC’s figures. Thus, there would be over half the U.S. population with “natural immunity,” which multiple studies suggest is superior to “vaccinated immunity*.”

Parents are now being asked to put their children’s lives in the hands of “experts” like Dr. Anthony Fauci. Given how often these “experts” have been wrong or outright lied — you would have to be an absolute fool to trust them.

Editor’s note: The prophylactic mRNA therapeutics being called “vaccines” do not give people “immunity.” They do not stop the spread and have been shown to only marginally lower transmission rates.


After Fauci Comes Under Fire, NIH Quietly Scrubs Funding for Puppy Torture Research from Horrific Study

"*" indicates required fields

Who would you vote for? Trump or DeSantis?*
This poll gives you free access to our premium politics newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

OPINION: This article contains commentary which reflects the author's opinion.